I am very proud to share with you an excerpt from my first opinion piece for the New York Times!
"FOR a growing number of American policy makers, politicians and activists, the best answer to the spiraling violence in Mexico is to legalize the marijuana that, they argue, fuels the country’s vicious cartels and smugglers. After all, according to official estimates, marijuana constitutes 60 percent of cartels’ drug profits. Legalization would move that trade into the open market, driving down the price and undermining the cartels’ power and influence. Unfortunately, it’s not that easy. Marijuana legalization has many merits, but it would do little to hinder the long-term economics of the cartels — and the violent toll they take on Mexican society."
To read the rest of my Op-Ed on the NYTimes website, please CLICK HERE!
Well done! As a layman, I agree that narcos will not be easily put away by denying some or all of one of their product lines.
Posted by: Kurt Taylor | June 18, 2011 at 10:14 PM
Once we legalize kidnapping, extortion and prostitution the cartels (DTOs, TCOs) won't stand a chance!
Posted by: Beltonwall | June 19, 2011 at 02:06 PM
Maybe the legalization of various drugs isn't gonna stop the cartels in a longterm perspective.
But as you say it has alot of other benefits and I believe it still would be an important first step in the fight towards organized crime. And besides if you could stop 60% of their income in short period of time it would take a long time for them to adapt to this new market.
I really dont see how a legalization could cause any harm. But I do think it's important that you inform people of that a legalization is just an answere to organized crime rather than a solution.
But as they say, only time will tell... I hope.
Posted by: André | June 19, 2011 at 07:42 PM
"And besides if you could stop 60% of their income in short period of time it would take a long time for them to adapt to this new market."
You are a little naive about the cartels. They will adapt very quickly and if they get deparate they will just steal more gas/oil and cause more violence.
The US Mafia did not end when prohibition ended. They just returned to loan sharking/prostitution and entered into the drug trade. The mafia was only hurt when arrests were made and long senteces imposed during the 60's and 70's.
Enforcing the law and justice, not running away is the only the only thing to do.
Posted by: anonymous_hero | June 20, 2011 at 10:57 AM
I would not be surprised to find out that the Mexican cartels are actually funneling $$ into the USA to support anti-legalization efforts on drugs. Drug legalization (e.g. marijuana) could potentially eat their profits ... so the irony is that the cartels may be fighting legalization by supporting right wing political organizations.
P.
Posted by: P | June 20, 2011 at 02:03 PM
"I would not be surprised to find out that the Mexican cartels are actually funneling $$ into the USA to support anti-legalization efforts on drugs"
I would think they would support the opposite. There would be a lot less attention to smuggling contraband to just avoid taxes. I would think they are overjoyed at the medical marijuana dispensaries in Arizona. Perfect opportunity to co-opt a legal enterprise to continue their illegal operations.
Nice ideologically driven arguement though.
Posted by: anonymous_hero | June 20, 2011 at 05:08 PM
@Hero
+1
Posted by: Beltonwall | June 20, 2011 at 06:56 PM
I think this article reaffirms the argument that Mexico doesn't just have a problem with drug trafficking and American demand for drugs, thay have an entrenched organized crime problem that is beginning to threaten their nation.
Many of their law enforcement, judicial and penal institutions are ineffective and corrupt because Mexico does not have a strong rule of law in their government or their culture.
Jorge Castaneda, former Foreign Minister of Mexico, wrote in an LA Times OP-ED 6/17/2011 " The rule of law does not really exist in Mexico today, in big and small matters alike" and that Mexicans must establish a "rule of law that guarantees its citizens security..."
Posted by: R Fung | June 22, 2011 at 12:41 AM
"Jorge Castaneda, former Foreign Minister of Mexico, wrote in an LA Times OP-ED 6/17/2011 " The rule of law does not really exist in Mexico today, in big and small matters alike" and that Mexicans must establish a "rule of law that guarantees its citizens security...""
The misunderstanding in this statement demonstrates the root cause of Mexico's ills. Mexico is not a haven for criminal activity because the government cannot guarantee it's people's security, it is because the people don't realize that it is NOT the government's job to guarantee their security. Every individual has a duty to protect themselves and their families. When they transfer that duty to the government they lose the right to defend themselves and to own the means for that defense.
Mexico has become a country of people rather than a country of laws. They do not have equal justice but justice based on who a person is. This is called social justice or liberation theology here in the US and has its roots in Marxism and other identity politics movements but I think there is a deeper connection to the plantation colonial days or even the native cultures of Mexico.
Mexicans, and most Latin Americans, need to realize that their duties and associated rights come from God not from government and begin to fight those who ignore those rights. If they abdicate their duties and rights to government they should not be surprised with what they get.
Posted by: anonymous_hero | June 22, 2011 at 12:22 PM
In fact, arrests for marijuana possession disproportionately affect blacks and Hispanics and reinforce the perception that law enforcement is biased and prejudiced against minorities.
Posted by: Kronic | July 08, 2011 at 04:54 AM